Most leaders treat decision-making as a single-voice process. You think it through. You weigh the options. You decide. Sometimes you call a friend and talk it out, but really you are not asking for a verdict; you are looking for a sounding board that confirms the conclusion you already reached. That is not counsel. That is an echo. And an echo cannot tell you when you are wrong.
Yesterday we introduced ALIGN, the third A of the Watchman's Protocol: calibrating to Truth before you operate the gate. We talked about the difference between a compass and a map, and why standing orders matter more than in-the-moment reasoning. Today we get into the mechanics. ALIGN uses a specific framework for calibration: three distinct voices that the Watchman consults before acting. The Protocol calls them the Three Witnesses, and they are Scripture, Counsel, and Conscience.
Deuteronomy 19:15 says that a matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses. The legal context is ancient, but the principle is not. One witness, however credible, is a single data point. Three witnesses who arrive independently at the same conclusion are something else entirely. The Watchman does not act on a single voice, no matter how convincing that voice sounds. He waits to hear from all three.
The first witness is Scripture. Not Scripture as a search engine where you type in your situation and extract a verse that tells you what to do. That approach almost always finds what it is looking for, which tells you more about the searcher than the text. Scripture functions in the ALIGN step the way a constitution functions in a courtroom: it is the founding document that establishes the character of the one who wrote it, the non-negotiables that cannot be negotiated away, the boundaries outside of which no good outcome lives. When you bring a decision to Scripture, the question is not whether there is a chapter and verse that addresses your specific situation. The question is whether the path you are considering honors what God's word has revealed about who God is and how he calls his people to live. Scripture sets the frame. It draws the walls. Inside those walls, there is still a lot of territory, and that is where the other two witnesses come in.
The second witness is Counsel. Not just anyone. The Watchman's Protocol is not asking you to crowd-source your decision or take a poll among colleagues. Counsel means trusted people with track records who have nothing to gain from your decision going a particular way, who know you well enough to see your blind spots, and who have demonstrated the willingness to tell you hard things. Proverbs 11:14 says there is victory in many advisers; the key word is many, not agreeable. A jury that only rubber-stamps the prosecution is not a jury; it is a formality. The counsel you need is the kind that cross-examines you. And critically, they need to know the real situation, not the version you curated to produce the answer you already wanted. If you have been selective with your advisers about the facts, you have not sought counsel. You have staged a verdict.
The third witness is Conscience. This one is the easiest to dismiss because it feels the most subjective, and leaders are trained to distrust feelings in professional contexts. But the conscience the Watchman's Protocol is referring to is not simply how you feel. It is deeper than that. Romans 2:15 describes the conscience as something that bears witness, that accuses or defends from within. It is the persistent signal that remains when the argument quiets down. Most people have experienced this: a decision that was perfectly logical, backed by good reasons, supported by people you trust, and yet something underneath it would not settle. That signal is not anxiety, which comes from uncertainty. It is not discomfort, which comes from hard choices. It is a specific, durable unease that does not respond to better arguments. When the Watchman consults Conscience, he is listening for that signal, and he takes it seriously.
Here is how the Three Witnesses work together in practice. You bring your decision to Scripture and ask whether this path is within the frame. You bring it to Counsel and ask whether the people who know you and love you without flattery see what you see. You bring it to Conscience and sit quietly long enough to hear what is underneath the reasoning. When all three align, Scripture says yes, trusted counsel says yes, and conscience is settled, you have a strong signal to move forward. That is not a guarantee; decisions can be made faithfully and still land hard. But it is the clearest footing the Watchman can have before he operates the gate.
The more important moment, though, is when they do not all agree. When Scripture seems clear but conscience is troubled. When counsel is divided. When you feel peace but every wise person in your life is hesitant. Those are the moments that require more work, not faster movement. And they are also the moments most vulnerable to a particular failure mode that we will look at tomorrow: using one witness to silence the other two. It has a name in the Protocol. It is the Ventriloquist God, and it is the most sophisticated way a leader can deceive themselves while believing they are being faithful. That is tomorrow. Today, the work is simpler: do you know your three witnesses? Do you know who your Counsel actually is? Have you given Conscience room to speak, or have you argued it into silence?
The gate stays closed until all three have been heard.
I write about leadership at the intersection of timeless principles and modern workplaces. Follow for weekly insights on building teams that actually work. For more articles like this consider subscribing to my Substack at: https://christianleadership.now